@davisforrep

@DavisForRep · — · —

?
Posts99
Engagement18
Voting-record position
CoverageFeb 20, 2021 to Dec 4, 2024
Voting-record position is available for 3,335 of 5,927 legislators. Missing values are shown, not hidden.

Voice fingerprint

Percentage-point difference between this legislator’s topic share and the party median. Bars left are under-indexed; bars right are over-indexed.

Most distinctive Government Operations 54.5 pp above the party median

Topics
22
Over
6
Under
0

Voice fingerprint. 14 topics shown on a symmetric scale from −54.5 pp to +54.5 pp. Most distinctive topic: Government Operations, 54.5 pp above the party median.

Under-indexed Party median Over-indexed
  1. Government Operations Over-indexed +54.5 pp
  2. Uncategorized Over-indexed +18.2 pp
  3. Civil Rights Over-indexed +10.1 pp
  4. Housing Over-indexed +8.1 pp
  5. Health Over-indexed +7.1 pp
  6. Law and Crime Over-indexed +2.0 pp
  7. Agriculture At median 0.0 pp
  8. Banking, Finance, and Domestic Commerce At median 0.0 pp
  9. Culture At median 0.0 pp
  10. Defense At median 0.0 pp
  11. Education At median 0.0 pp
  12. Energy At median 0.0 pp
  13. Environment At median 0.0 pp
  14. Immigration At median 0.0 pp

Bars share a symmetric scale of ±54.5 pp. Showing 14 of 22 topics under the selected ordering. 16 topics match the party median exactly.

View complete comparison table
Complete topic-share comparison with the party median
TopicLegislator shareParty medianDifferenceDirectionPosts
Government Operations54.5%0.0%+54.5 ppOver-indexed54
Uncategorized18.2%0.0%+18.2 ppOver-indexed18
Civil Rights10.1%0.0%+10.1 ppOver-indexed10
Housing8.1%0.0%+8.1 ppOver-indexed8
Health7.1%0.0%+7.1 ppOver-indexed7
Law and Crime2.0%0.0%+2.0 ppOver-indexed2
Agriculture0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Banking, Finance, and Domestic Commerce0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Culture0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Defense0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Education0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Energy0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Environment0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Immigration0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
International Affairs0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Labor0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Macroeconomics0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Public Lands0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Social Welfare0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Technology0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Transportation0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Unclassified0.0%0.0%0.0 ppAt median0
Derived interaction graph

@davisforrep's interaction network

Explore parsed retweets and mentions linked to known legislators and external handles. Filter by direction, topic, target party, target state, or interaction type.

12 nodes 18 links 29 out 9 in
Wheel to zoom · drag to pan
Mentions to Tony Lovasco: 6 unique postsMentions from Tony Lovasco: 6 unique postsMentions to Adam Schwadron: 6 unique postsMentions to Bill Owen: 4 unique postsMentions from @saraformissouri: 2 unique postsMentions to Bill Eigel: 2 unique postsMentions to Bob Onder: 1 unique postsMentions to Bishop Davidson: 1 unique postsMentions to Eric Burlison: 1 unique postsMentions to Adam Schwadron: 1 unique postsMentions from Tony Lovasco: 1 unique postsMentions to Tony Lovasco: 1 unique postsMentions to Derek Grier: 1 unique postsMentions to Cindy O'Laughlin: 1 unique postsMentions to Phil Christofanelli: 1 unique postsMentions to Bill Eigel: 1 unique postsMentions to Ben Baker: 1 unique postsMentions to Bill Owen: 1 unique posts?RRRRRRRRRRRR

Post explorer

Switch between this legislator's most-engaged posts, newest posts, and representative samples.

  • 10 matching posts

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

RT @JeffSmithMO: Very excited to work w/ #MOLeg @RepMichaelDavis to pass the 2025 Donald J. Trump Election Qualification Act!! https://t.c…

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@Sam201810 @TRMayfield I could not care less how voters in downtown St. Louis voted. My constituents voted against medicaid expansion by double digits. They were right to do so. Medicaid expansion harms the most vulnerable in society.

Health

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@RareCamellia @tonylovasco The total number of bills filed doesn’t really matter. The Speaker and Pro Tem only refers a small fraction of the bills filed to committees. However I would like your idea if you were to modify it to say that reps can refer three of their own bills to committees directly.

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@RareCamellia @tonylovasco The total number of bills filed doesn’t really matter. The Speaker and Pro Tem only refers a small fraction of the bills filed to committees. However I would like your idea if you were to modify it to say that reps can refer three of their own bills to committees directly.

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@RareCamellia @tonylovasco The total number of bills filed doesn’t really matter. The Speaker and Pro Tem only refers a small fraction of the bills filed to committees. However I would like your idea if you were to modify it to say that reps can refer three of their own bills to committees directly.

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@RareCamellia @tonylovasco The total number of bills filed doesn’t really matter. The Speaker and Pro Tem only refers a small fraction of the bills filed to committees. However I would like your idea if you were to modify it to say that reps can refer three of their own bills to committees directly.

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@RareCamellia @tonylovasco The total number of bills filed doesn’t really matter. The Speaker and Pro Tem only refers a small fraction of the bills filed to committees. However I would like your idea if you were to modify it to say that reps can refer three of their own bills to committees directly.

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@RareCamellia @tonylovasco The total number of bills filed doesn’t really matter. The Speaker and Pro Tem only refers a small fraction of the bills filed to committees. However I would like your idea if you were to modify it to say that reps can refer three of their own bills to committees directly.

Government Operations

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@Missouri_Mapper Out of self-interest, a hypothetical state house map.

Uncategorized

@davisforrep

@DavisForRep

Party unknown State unavailable

@Missouri_Mapper @AKfromKCMO Although Mike Moon has an Ash Grove address, his home is in Lawrence County. Except for the election cycle immediately following redistricting, legislators must be a resident of the district for at least one year before the general election.

Government Operations