RT @ABC: Vice Pres. Kamala Harris: "Today we feel a sigh of relief. Still, it cannot take away the pain. A measure of justice isn't the sam…
Judy Schwank
@SenJudySchwank · PA · S
Posts664
Engagement7,977
Voting-record position0.037
CoverageJan 10, 2020 to Sep 16, 2024
Voting-record position is available for 3,335 of 5,927 legislators. Missing values are shown, not hidden.
Voice fingerprint
Percentage-point difference between this legislator’s topic share and the party median. Bars left are under-indexed; bars right are over-indexed.
Most distinctive Law and Crime 1.6 pp above the party median
- Topics
- 1
- Over
- 1
- Under
- 0
Voice fingerprint. 1 topics shown on a symmetric scale from −1.6 pp to +1.6 pp. Most distinctive topic: Law and Crime, 1.6 pp above the party median.
Under-indexed Party median Over-indexed
- Law and Crime Over-indexed +1.6 pp
Bars share a symmetric scale of ±1.6 pp.
View complete comparison table
| Topic | Legislator share | Party median | Difference | Direction | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law and Crime | 5.7% | 4.1% | +1.6 pp | Over-indexed | 664 |
Derived interaction graph
Judy Schwank's interaction network
Explore parsed retweets and mentions linked to known legislators and external handles. Filter by direction, topic, target party, target state, or interaction type.
16 nodes 22 links 41 out 10 in
Post explorer
Switch between this legislator's most-engaged posts, newest posts, and representative samples.
- 10 matching posts
RT @ABC: What the numbers show on Americans' opinions of gun control measures: https://t.co/g8uDtS4CuT https://t.co/HYwg0YFVxC
RT @GovernorTomWolf: Pennsylvania saw an increase in gun violence in 2021. We must resolve to better protect residents in 2022. Legislato<U+2026>
RT @AJCGlobal: We are immensely relieved and grateful that the hostage situation at Congregation Beth Israel has come to an end and that th<U+2026>
I'll be voting no. HB 1737 directly challenges a PA Supreme Court ruling from 2020, is highly intrusive and is not looking out for the best interests of families. https://t.co/JzyoMUtbsy
I'll be voting no. HB 1737 directly challenges a PA Supreme Court ruling from 2020, is highly intrusive and is not looking out for the best interests of families. https://t.co/JzyoMUtbsy
I'll be voting no. HB 1737 directly challenges a PA Supreme Court ruling from 2020, is highly intrusive and is not looking out for the best interests of families. https://t.co/JzyoMUtbsy
I'll be voting no. HB 1737 directly challenges a PA Supreme Court ruling from 2020, is highly intrusive and is not looking out for the best interests of families. https://t.co/JzyoMUtbsy
I'll be voting no. HB 1737 directly challenges a PA Supreme Court ruling from 2020, is highly intrusive and is not looking out for the best interests of families. https://t.co/JzyoMUtbsy
I'll be voting no. HB 1737 directly challenges a PA Supreme Court ruling from 2020, is highly intrusive and is not looking out for the best interests of families. https://t.co/JzyoMUtbsy