RT @TPWDnews: We are devastated to report that 3 of our colleagues died in a helicopter crash yesterday while conducting aerial surveys for&
Tom Oliverson
@TomOliverson · TX · H
Posts23
Engagement427
Voting-record position0.152
CoverageJul 28, 2020 to Jun 15, 2023
Voting-record position is available for 3,335 of 5,927 legislators. Missing values are shown, not hidden.
Voice fingerprint
Percentage-point difference between this legislator’s topic share and the party median. Bars left are under-indexed; bars right are over-indexed.
Most distinctive Technology 0.1 pp below the party median
- Topics
- 1
- Over
- 0
- Under
- 1
Voice fingerprint. 1 topics shown on a symmetric scale from −1.0 pp to +1.0 pp. Most distinctive topic: Technology, 0.1 pp below the party median.
Under-indexed Party median Over-indexed
- Technology Under-indexed −0.1 pp
Bars share a symmetric scale of ±1.0 pp.
View complete comparison table
| Topic | Legislator share | Party median | Difference | Direction | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 0.2% | 0.3% | −0.1 pp | Under-indexed | 23 |
Derived interaction graph
Tom Oliverson's interaction network
Explore parsed retweets and mentions linked to known legislators and external handles. Filter by direction, topic, target party, target state, or interaction type.
1 nodes 1 links 1 out 0 in
Post explorer
Switch between this legislator's most-engaged posts, newest posts, and representative samples.
- 10 matching posts
RT @SecAzar: Operation #WarpSpeed is an unprecedented scientific effort powered by a well-designed strategy giving Americans the highest pr&
Politicization of science will be the death of science. @CDCgov and @US_FDA have lost all credibility on this issue. #txlege https://t.co/ilv5wDHT8H
#Texas has been ranked as the #1 tech exporter in the United States for the past 8 years in a row, with total goods valued at $44.8 billion in 2020. To learn more about why these sectors continue to do well here in the Lone Star State, visit https://t.co/IZQ8hr0hrd.
Does this mean that COVID-19 studies published are unreliable? It does not. But remember that good peer review takes time. And anything that is shared on social media in a preprinted format is unproven, unreliable, and hence so are your conclusions if you rely upon it.
Not just a ball of cells it seems<U+2026>. #Knowledgeispower #txlege https://t.co/wPVWaunPRk
RT @TXGOPCaucus: In a rapidly developing world of technology, both consumers and businesses have more access and data in their hands. That<U+2019><U+2026>
RT @TxEMSA: Thanks to @TomOliverson & @electcharles for passing HB 786, which would require continuing education provided to telecommunicat…
Very interesting article. Could there be an antitrust issue looming in digital media? Is a read local movement on the horizon? #txlege https://t.co/1f7ju3oQSX
What that means is that other scientists, experts in the same field, have not had a chance to analyze the methods, results, statistical analysis, and conclusions of the study. Peer review is the best practice we have available to ensure the validity of a studys conclusions.