@PeterHotez What have you to say concerning <U+201C>the aggression against scientists<U+201D> who disagree with your assessment of the situation, your proposals in reference to the situation as you assessed it, and the insistence that those proposals be enforced without discussion to the detriment of all?
Marshall Wilson
@smarshallwilson · WV · H
Voice fingerprint
Percentage-point difference between this legislator’s topic share and the party median. Bars left are under-indexed; bars right are over-indexed.
Most distinctive Technology 0.3 pp below the party median
- Topics
- 1
- Over
- 0
- Under
- 1
Voice fingerprint. 1 topics shown on a symmetric scale from −1.0 pp to +1.0 pp. Most distinctive topic: Technology, 0.3 pp below the party median.
- Technology Under-indexed −0.3 pp
Bars share a symmetric scale of ±1.0 pp.
View complete comparison table
| Topic | Legislator share | Party median | Difference | Direction | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | 0.0% | 0.3% | −0.3 pp | Under-indexed | 5 |
Marshall Wilson's interaction network
Explore parsed retweets and mentions linked to known legislators and external handles. Filter by direction, topic, target party, target state, or interaction type.
Post explorer
Switch between this legislator's most-engaged posts, newest posts, and representative samples.
- 2 matching posts
@pageyjim @VERBAL_CHANCLA @ScotsFyre What we *should* do is to recognize that scientists are Men and, like all Men, corrupt and driven by priorities other than those they publicly espouse; therefore their every word should be measured and sifted for intent. Also, we must recognize technocracy as anathema to Liberty.