Today I sent a letter to the Governor, asking her to reopen golf courses in Michigan, as long as proper social distancing and health safety rules are followed --> https://t.co/osb3fd3YS8
Graham Filler
@grahamfiller · MI · H
Voice fingerprint
Percentage-point difference between this legislator’s topic share and the party median. Bars left are under-indexed; bars right are over-indexed.
Most distinctive Civil Rights 3.1 pp below the party median
- Topics
- 1
- Over
- 0
- Under
- 1
Voice fingerprint. 1 topics shown on a symmetric scale from −3.1 pp to +3.1 pp. Most distinctive topic: Civil Rights, 3.1 pp below the party median.
- Civil Rights Under-indexed −3.1 pp
Bars share a symmetric scale of ±3.1 pp.
View complete comparison table
| Topic | Legislator share | Party median | Difference | Direction | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civil Rights | 1.0% | 4.1% | −3.1 pp | Under-indexed | 30 |
Graham Filler's interaction network
Explore parsed retweets and mentions linked to known legislators and external handles. Filter by direction, topic, target party, target state, or interaction type.
Post explorer
Switch between this legislator's most-engaged posts, newest posts, and representative samples.
- 7 matching posts
Thanks to @DNBethLeBlanc and the @detroitnews for reporting on the proposed Supreme Court rule that would massively alter how background checks are done in Michigan, and my legislation that seeks to preserve DOB for background checks. https://t.co/R2rx5RzeKM https://t.co/KqEDM5EUYS
Love it @SBAM @nfib_mi - A huge thank you for highlighting HB 5368, which simply allows name and DOB can be used when completing background checks. Common sense legislation, protects the public safety, helps job applicants. https://t.co/7HToSxRS6K
I think youll enjoy the term limits discussion of these attack mailers that have been all over my district. If the purpose of the attack mailings was to make me fearful of speaking about the issue, those attacks failed. https://t.co/z8yrs0YHzy
If your business hires anyone & does background checks, this proposed rule will impact that process. The proposed rule will hamstring an employer from completing accurate background checks, leading to public safety issues, leading to confusion & uncertainty for job applicants.
Hoping that resolution can be reached that protects individuals personal info, & also allows employers to do proper background checks to protect the public safety. It<U+2019>s also a pro applicant bill - if MI job applicants cannot have timely checks, they may not get the job. https://t.co/YPPaCIZaEr
Proud to be a <U+201C>Guardian of Small Business<U+201D> w/ @nfib_mi. I worked to protect the right of businesses to do basic background checks (HB 5368). Sounds mundane, but a proposed Supreme Court rule threatened to gut the background check process in MI. https://t.co/zvWDKuESGg https://t.co/Og3ZasVHKD